Sigma88 changed the topic of #Kopernicus to: #Kopernicus | Release 1.3.0-8 - https://git.io/v0Gg5 | Pictures: https://git.io/vHqLy | List of packs: http://git.io/vWjiY | GitHub: http://git.io/vWAFE | Examples: http://git.io/vWAF9 | Visual Editor: http://git.io/vWAbq | Funny Quotes: https://git.io/vHqt8 | <Kopernicus> Kopernicus/master 91e89a4 thomas-jenkins: Kopernicus 1.2.2-6 - "404 - Title not found"
Guest53800 has quit [Ping timeout: 186 seconds]
Mead has joined #Kopernicus
Mead is now known as Guest33042
Guest33042 is now known as Mead
Mead has quit [Quit: Work complete!]
ferram4 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
ferram4_ has joined #Kopernicus
ferram4_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
ferram4 has joined #Kopernicus
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 opened pull request #275: fixes for the main menu (master...MainMenuFixes) https://git.io/vARKB
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] StollD commented on issue #275: What I don't understand is: Why do we need another dummy component if we can do the same work in RuntimeUtility.Awake()/Start()? Having another component just bloats the code.
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 commented on issue #275: [RuntimeUtility runs only once](https://github.com/Kopernicus/Kopernicus/blob/94f2cd87fab328d1ab925070f5f9b824b2a1b34c/src/Kopernicus/RuntimeUtility/RuntimeUtility.cs#L44) but we need the code for the mainmenu to run at every "MainMenu.Awake() / .Start()" (that's why you had it in "Update()" before, which is why it was leaving one frame of un-edited mainmenu in the first place)... https://gi
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 commented on issue #275: also, is there a way to have the boolean setup so that it doesn't require external plugins to have Kopernicus as a reference? https://git.io/vARNI
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 commented on issue #275: if you prefere leaving it the way it was working before it's fine for me... https://git.io/vARAR
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 commented on issue #275: if you prefere leaving it the way it was working before it's fine for me... https://git.io/vARAR
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 commented on issue #275: if you prefere leaving it the way it was working before it's fine for me... https://git.io/vARAR
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 closed issue #270: update MM https://git.io/vAnVm
<Kopernicus> [Kopernicus] Sigma88 commented on issue #275: I've written this alternative as well... https://git.io/vARhH