04:16 <raptop> that's certainly a paper title https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07438

04:16 <galois> [arXiv] “Voids fill us in on rising cosmology tensions” Sofia Contarini, Alice Pisani, Nico Hamaus et al. — «We investigate the main tensions within the current standard model of cosmology from the perspective of the main statistics of cosmic voids, using the final BOSS DR12 data set. For this purpose, we present the first estimate of the $S_8\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}$ and $H_0$ parameters obtained from void number…»

04:16 <raptop> astronomers naming things: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06117

04:16 <galois> [arXiv] “WISDOM project -- XVI. SMBH mass in the early-type galaxies NGC0612, NGC1574, and NGC4261 from CO dynamical modelling” Ilaria Ruffa, Timothy A. Davis, Michele Cappellari et al. — «We present a CO dynamical estimate of the mass of the super-massive black hole (SMBH) in three nearby early-type galaxies: NGC0612, NGC1574 and NGC4261. Our analysis is based on Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) Cycle 3-6…»

04:16 <raptop> astronomers naming things: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06084

04:16 <galois> [arXiv] “Cosmology with one galaxy? -- The ASTRID model and robustness” Nicolas Echeverri, Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Chaitanya Chawak et al. — «Recent work has pointed out the potential existence of a tight relation between the cosmological parameter $\Omega_{\rm m}$, at fixed $\Omega_{\rm b}$, and the properties of individual galaxies in state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. In this paper, we investigate…»

04:17 <SnoopJ> !8 is that first one a sign of anxiety over inflation?

04:17 <galois> SnoopJ: no

04:32 <raptop> hah

23:12 <raptop> blink https://twitter.com/GBruhaug/status/1647628234438189056

23:12 <raptop> cc: SnoopJ I think, even though this is lasers and not accelerators

23:14 <SnoopJ> there's a mention of LPWA in the replies, so it counts