00:17 <taniwha> blender's volume is fairly accurate (could be better, but that's due to FP math and doing it slightly wrong)

00:18 <taniwha> but the algorithm is correct

16:19 <xShadowx> taniwha: blender algorithm is 'convaity aware'? or whatever the term is :| bst i could get from googling

16:19 <xShadowx> concavity-aware*

16:20 <xShadowx> wonder if theres a way i can pull that algorithm into c# then.....since blender would be python?

16:22 <xShadowx> i found a few algorithms that say concavity-aware but they were all voxel based and slow, blender does seem to calc it a fair bit faster

16:27 <xShadowx> considering i need to run it multiple times as the mesh shape changes, but always the same number of verts ever so slightly morphed, i'm thinking the better long term performance goal would be use the tetrahedron method, and map out multiple origins / vert groups, nd combine, but thats a ton of effort on a 1mil poly model :|

18:32 <xShadowx> ah i found another volume calc in blender i the 3d print toolbox

18:33 <xShadowx> this one shows diff volume, and with primitives looks like its all correct with concave stuff

18:44 <xShadowx> now hmm...how to drag this over to c#...