UmbralRaptop changed the topic of #principia to: READ THE FAQ: http://goo.gl/gMZF9H; The current version is Fermat. We currently target 1.5.1, 1.6.1, and 1.7.2. <scott_manley> anyone that doubts the wisdom of retrograde bop needs to get the hell out | https://xkcd.com/323/ | <egg> calculating the influence of lamont on Pluto is a bit silly…
<discord->
neph. — not bad for an unguided upper stage 🤙
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — What was your launch profile?
<discord->
neph. — direct polar ascent
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — Ohhh
egg|zzz|egg has quit [Ping timeout: 198 seconds]
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — Did you use a historical launch date?
egg|zzz|egg has joined #principia
egg|zzz|egg has quit [Ping timeout: 202 seconds]
<discord->
neph. — Nope, I had to calculate my own launch window
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — How was that?
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — I wanna find resources and stuff like that to help understand orbital dynamics
<discord->
neph. — Pain in the ass, mostly.
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — What resources did you use?
<discord->
neph. — kos and about two weeks of irl time
<discord->
neph. — i'd like to say my dank math skills but to be honest just trial and error in KRASH was more time-efficient
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — Jesus
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — Idek where to start to do the math for that
<discord->
neph. — the math would be surmountable if it wasn't, well, principia
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — I have no idea how to calculate most trajectories
<discord->
neph. — That said, my approach was simply: 1) reliably get a 385Mm earth apogee 2) reliably place my earth apogee in the plane of the moon 3) reliably time it so that the moon will be over my earth apogee/lunar ascending node when I am
<discord->
neph. — launching polar worked because it allowed me to compensate for the inherent plane difference with the latitude traversed between ascent and insertion into TLI
<discord->
neph. — launching polar worked because it allowed me to compensate for the inherent plane difference with the latitude traversed between the KSC and insertion into TLI (edited)
<discord->
neph. — Do note that this approach requires launching over the south pole, so you'll have to have your rocket be autonomous for nearly all the ascent. kOS helps here significantly.
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — I have a lot of trouble getting on the same plane of the Moon for some reason when precession is not kind 😃
<discord->
neph. — again, kos helps since you can calc the relative plane difference in real time
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — Cant have you KER or Mechjeb do that?
<discord->
neph. — maybe but on god I'm not going to figure out how
<discord->
RurouniDonut. — Hmm
Mike` has quit [Ping timeout: 190 seconds]
Mike` has joined #principia
Jesin has quit [Ping timeout: 198 seconds]
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — Wait
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — KER can guide rockets?
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy opened pull request #2244: Disable the prediction controls when there is no predicted vessel - https://git.io/fjXm4
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] eggrobin labeled pull request #2244: Disable the prediction controls when there is no predicted vessel - https://git.io/fjXm4
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] eggrobin labeled pull request #2243: Use angles for the argument of the Jacobi functions and the result of the integrals - https://git.io/fjXTh
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy closed issue #2239: The tolerance and steps settings are not presereved across scene changes - https://git.io/fjinj
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy pushed 2 commits to master [+0/-0/±2] https://git.io/fjXmS
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy 0d7af17 - Disable the prediction controls when there is no vessel whose prediction is displayed.
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy 34ffcac - Merge pull request #2244 from pleroy/2239 Disable the prediction controls when there is no predicted vessel
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy closed pull request #2244: Disable the prediction controls when there is no predicted vessel - https://git.io/fjXm4
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy closed issue #1958: Add support for uninitialized Quantity - https://git.io/fx88X
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy closed pull request #2243: Use angles for the argument of the Jacobi functions and the result of the integrals - https://git.io/fjXTh
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy pushed 12 commits to master [+5/-0/±58] https://git.io/fjXm9
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy 62e2802 - Not sure if this goes anywhere.
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy e61319e - Full implementation using angles.
<discord->
Standecco. — jupiter's magnetic field (and its axis) isn't perpendicular to the orbital plane of its moons
<discord->
Standecco. — is this right?
<discord->
egg. — @Standecco that's not right, it looks like you don't have Principia
<discord->
Standecco. — I don't since it's a test install
<discord->
egg. — ah, then it's WAI
<discord->
Standecco. — I don't since it's a dev install (edited)
<discord->
egg. — no axial tilt in stock
<discord->
egg. — @Standecco but if you want to test @Sir Mortimer's work on tilting magnetic fields, you're going to need Principia :-p
egg|cell|egg has quit [Ping timeout: 206 seconds]
<discord->
Standecco. — no way to have correct magnetic fields in stock then?
<discord->
egg. — not if you tilt the satellites correctly; and if you don't tilt the satellite correctly, the Δv numbers and manoeuvres will be wrong
<discord->
Standecco. — installed principia and jupiter is tilted, but it doesn't look right anyway
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — that's a horseshoe, right?
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — i was more or less forced into that orbit. it's a cube sat without attitude control, and the only engine on it doesn't gimbal - which came as a nasty surprise.
<discord->
egg. — @Sir Mortimer is that the KCKF frame?
<discord->
egg. — looks like an eccentric semisynchronous orbit, a bit like молния
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — yes 😃
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — I'm just doing a low energy transfer to mun
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — principia is loads of fun 😛
<discord->
egg. — @Sir Mortimer if this is KCKF, the orbit doesn't seem to be doing anything particularly weird; it's just something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Molniya.jpg
<discord->
egg. — in KCI it should be a pretty normal ellipse
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — it is, but the KCI screenshot is way less cool 😄
<discord->
egg. — obviously
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — 9 bits/second to Kerbin
<discord->
egg. — and KCKF is interesting if you are doing things where the surface matters (telecom, GNSS, earth observation, etc.)
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — yep
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — btw I already started working on a contracts mod that interacts with kerbalism
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — it already controls the visibility of radiation belts. you have to cross the field boundaries with a Geiger counter a couple of times for it to become visible. not quite how the real thing works, but it's a fun approximation for the game
egg|zzz|egg has quit [Ping timeout: 202 seconds]
egg|zzz|egg has joined #principia
<discord->
egg. — interesting
<discord->
egg. — I'll have to keep poking at that design doc
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — I'm currently tossing ideas in my head regarding things I need to fix before I can require an experiment to be running on a vessel for a contract without polling the vessel state all the time.
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — when I have that, I can essentially create "have experiment X running" contract parameters. in combination with "be above location Y within a few degrees of elevation from the surface" you can do a lot of fun stuff
egg|zzz|egg has quit [Ping timeout: 206 seconds]
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — "There will be a sport event near location X. Provide uninterrupted Kerkom coverage over that location from $begin to $end.
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — "There will be a sport event near location X. Provide uninterrupted Kerkom coverage over that location from $begin to $end." (edited)
<discord->
Sir Mortimer. — But the requirement really should check for the experiment to be running. Depending on what it is, that can be a problem on it's own: you need EC, connectivity, possibly other resources like coolant...
egg|zzz|egg has joined #principia
Jesin has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Jesin has joined #principia
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] pleroy opened pull request #2246: Document an algorithm by Fukushima - https://git.io/fjXnn
<discord->
rsparkyc. — @Standecco @egg so, some more details regarding my performance issues in RSS. Did a stock+principia install, and put a vessel in LKO. Maxed out timewarp and noticed that it still ran smoothly. Turns out, the max stock timewarp is 1x10^5, however my realism overhaul install lets me crank it up to 6x10^6 (60 times faster than stock). Even 1 below max in RO is 1x10^6; an order of magnitude highe
egg|zzz|egg has quit [Ping timeout: 202 seconds]
<discord->
Standecco. — @rsparkyc try installing this mod, it adds a 10 million warp rate: https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/148278-ksp-162018-12-22-warpeverywhere-v10-warp-faster-in-more-places/
<discord->
rsparkyc. — do you want KSP to be locked up forever?!?! my estimates put installing that providing me a framerate of 0.1 frames/second
<discord->
Standecco. — oh come on, it's only 10 seconds!
<discord->
rsparkyc. — ...
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] rsparkyc opened issue #2247: Poor performance at max timewarp in Realism Overhaul - https://git.io/fjXnS
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] eggrobin f66e0ec - a test
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] eggrobin f86e4d1 - the test passes
<_whitenotifier-5dfc>
[Principia] ... and 9 more commits.
<discord->
egg. — @rsparkyc one thing we have noticed is that it is stupidly slow if you set a long prediction (even though it should be fine now that the prediction is asynchronous), because the computation of the ascending/descending nodes is done very badly
<discord->
egg. — and we show the nodes in ECI since Fatou, so that made matters worse
<discord->
rsparkyc. — ok, i can try lowering the prediction length when i'm just warping at the space center and see if that does it
<discord->
rsparkyc. — i'll update the ticket with my findings
<discord->
Mike. — Does that have an effect in the space center where no orbits or anything like that are shown?