egg changed the topic of #principia to: Logs: https://esper.irclog.whitequark.org/principia | <scott_manley> anyone that doubts the wisdom of retrograde bop needs to get the hell out | https://xkcd.com/323/ | <egg> calculating the influence of lamont on Pluto is a bit silly…
_whitelogger has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
armed_troop has quit [*.net *.split]
paculino has quit [*.net *.split]
Rokker has quit [*.net *.split]
goblin has quit [*.net *.split]
goblin has joined #principia
Rokker has joined #principia
armed_troop has joined #principia
paculino has joined #principia
armed_troop has quit [*.net *.split]
paculino has quit [*.net *.split]
armed_troop has joined #principia
paculino has joined #principia
<queqiao-> ⟨justaregular911_58885⟩ so I'm about to start constructing a Sapce Spation in KSRSS. What inclination should I launch it in such that it still remains accessible from Cape Canaveral even after the effects of nodal precession?
<queqiao-> ⟨justaregular911_58885⟩ * Station
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ Nodal precession does not affect your inclination (nodal precession of the moon affects its inclination with respect to the equator, but that is because it is the nodal precession with respect to the ecliptic).
<queqiao-> ⟨justaregular911_58885⟩ hmmm so basically if I'm understanding correctly, the inclination remains the same, but the position of the nodes change w.r.t an inertial reference frame (Earth's center maybe??)
<queqiao-> ⟨GoForPDI (less drag=more faster)⟩ You could try the IRL pretty much universal station inclination of 51.6
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<queqiao-> ⟨redtyro⟩ wasn't that inclination chosen so the russians could get to it from their higher inclination? I'd assume you could go lower if you're only trying to access it from the cape
<queqiao-> ⟨raptop | ²³⁹Pu powered⟩ That was why. Looks like Skylab went with 50° for earth observation purposes. (And I could swear that at some point they were considering 65°)
<queqiao-> ⟨redtyro⟩ was it actual science observation or were they going for "earth observation" like they launched "weather satellites?"
<queqiao-> ⟨GoForPDI (less drag=more faster)⟩ I believe it was actual science since Skylab was a civilian station
<queqiao-> ⟨raptop | ²³⁹Pu powered⟩ I'd assume more the former, though the actual benefits were a bit hit or miss. Looks like Landsat 1 had launched a year earlier
<queqiao-> ⟨redtyro⟩ yeah, I know it was civilian, but that never stopped the military from influencing capability parameters... it's how we got the shuttle, after all
<_whitenotifier-536> [Principia] pleroy closed pull request #4001: Stehlé-Zimmermann multisearch - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/4001
<_whitenotifier-536> [Principia] pleroy opened pull request #4002: Fix a bug in the Stehlé-Zimmermann when T goes all the way down to 0 - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/4002
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ Stehlé-Zimmermann?
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ i kept finding this: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-24847-7_31
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<_whitenotifier-536> [Principia] pleroy closed pull request #4002: Fix a bug in the Stehlé-Zimmermann algorithm when T goes all the way down to 0 - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/4002