UmbralRaptor changed the topic of #kspacademia to: https://gist.github.com/pdn4kd/164b9b85435d87afbec0c3a7e69d3e6d | Dogs are cats. Spiders are cat interferometers. | Космизм сегодня! | Document well, for tomorrow you may get mauled by a ネコバス. | <UmbralRaptor> egg|nomz|egg: generally if your eyes are dewing over, that's not the weather. | <ferram4> I shall beat my problems to death with an engineer. | We can haz pdf
<raptop>
!choose eat|eat
<galois>
raptop: Your options: eat, eat. My choice: eat
<raptop>
eggcelent choice
<egg|anbo|egg>
raptop: KerbalismContract question: how does one prevent a handful of KH-11s essentially winning the remote sensing game (i.e., is their imaging limited by some sort of exposure/pointing considerations)?
<egg|anbo|egg>
I guess the limitation is just the smol swath and then the fact that pointing time is still much smaller than the motion across the sky (no spinning a KH-11 like it’s an MSG SEVIRI to get infinite swath) ?
<raptop>
smol swath, there was an era when they couldn't do much of pointing, and they sometimes have time-sensitivity
<egg|anbo|egg>
three KHes earlier but per millimeter at a 2:1 image contrast and an overall optical figure of 1/10)". GAMBIT was to carry 3,000 feet of 9.5-inch-wide, thin-base film through a strip camera, which would provide image-motion compensation by moving the film across an exposure slit at the same velocity that the projected image moved over the earth. When looking vertically, the camera would image a strip on the earth 10.6
<raptop>
Also, doesn't the US currently only have like 4 KH-11 equivalents up?
<egg|anbo|egg>
ah that got cut off: When looking vertically, the camera would image a strip on the earth 10.6 nm wide.
<egg|anbo|egg>
I am going to assume those are nmi, not nm
<egg|anbo|egg>
otherwise this is a very smol swath
<egg|anbo|egg>
raptop: yeah, but even if they had a dozen that wouldn’t put a dent in the need for weather sats and the like so I am trying to figure out how to model that
<egg|anbo|egg>
if you don’t model pointing and the satellite can magically spin around to look at all the things, it gets silly :-p
<egg|anbo|egg>
nominal exposure time for the GAMBIT-3 strip camera is 6.72 ms
<egg|anbo|egg>
(but they have this scrolling film trick so it’s not as blurrycam as that would imply, they mention 6 ft)
<raptop>
>6 ft
<raptop>
socially distanced satellite
<egg|anbo|egg>
please stand far enough apart that GAMBIT-3 can resolve you
<raptop>
:D
<raptop>
I mean, FoV is a big thing here
<raptop>
Also to some degree wavelengths (compare visible for spy sats vs IR for clouds vs radiometers for ice)
<egg|anbo|egg>
yeah FoV is the obvious difference, but spy sats do pointing far from the nadir so you can’t just treat it as tiny swaths (otherwise you would never see anything in time with your poor KH-11)
<egg|anbo|egg>
so then the question is how to model it so it doesn’t do all the things by instapointing to anything you want to see that is above its horizon
<egg|anbo|egg>
do they track points on the surface or just shift their swath cross-track
<egg|anbo|egg>
the last image on https://what-if.xkcd.com/32/ makes the former hypothesis but it seems there’s a lot of talk of swath at least in the earlier KH docs
<galois>
title: Hubble
<galois>
Pillar | Alt-text: A comic by my brother Doug, redrawn and rewritten by me
<raptop>
Unsure, though I do no that they did minor orbit adjustments for getting better images or images at better times (past tense because the interviews were for vietnam era intel)
<raptop>
Uh, the war vietnam fought with the US, not the one with Japan, the one with France, the one with China, the one with Cambodia, or the other one with China
<egg|anbo|egg>
yes, the American war
e_14159_ has joined #kspacademia
e_14159 has quit [Ping timeout: 378 seconds]
<raptop>
...random thing from poking wikipedia: ceres may have marginally lower surface gravity than charon
<raptop>
!choose chronic illness|cthonic illness
<galois>
raptop: Your options: chronic illness, cthonic illness. My choice: chronic illness
<egg|cell|egg>
... if we assume that KH-11 is WFC3 pointing down that's an FoV of 230 m? That seems too smol
<galois>
[WIKIPEDIA] Alcatel#Alcatel et CGE, deux entreprises différentes | "Alcatel (acronyme d'Alsacienne de constructions atomiques, de télécommunications et d’électronique) était une entreprise française spécialisée dans le secteur des télécommunications. Elle fusionne avec Lucent Technologies au mois de décembre 2006 pour devenir « Alcatel-Lucent ». Alcatel-Lucent est rachetée…"
<egg|laptop|egg>
uh, why did I link to that subsection
<galois>
[WIKIPEDIA] Alcatel#Société alsacienne de constructions mécaniques | "Alcatel (acronyme d'Alsacienne de constructions atomiques, de télécommunications et d’électronique) était une entreprise française spécialisée dans le secteur des télécommunications. Elle fusionne avec Lucent Technologies au mois de décembre 2006 pour devenir « Alcatel-Lucent ». Alcatel-Lucent est rachetée…"
<egg|laptop|egg>
En 1963, sont regroupées sur site du Château Rouge la Société Alsacienne d'Electronique et de Mécanique Appliquée (SAEMA, filiale de la SACM), le département ENTE9 et la SOLMEA pour constituer la Société Alsacienne de Constructions Atomiques et de Télécommunications (ALCATEL)
<egg|laptop|egg>
where ENTE is ENTE (Energie Nucléaire, Télécommunications, Electronique)
<egg|laptop|egg>
!acr -add:SACM Société Alsacienne de Constructions Mécaniques
<raptop>
company name idea: iridium heavy industries
<raptop>
(osmium, etc also work)
<raptop>
!choose byzantine fault tolerance|turkey's seismic construction code(s)
<galois>
raptop: Your options: byzantine fault tolerance, turkey's seismic construction code(s). My choice: byzantine fault tolerance
egg|laptop|egg has joined #kspacademia
egg|laptop|egg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<raptop>
" Due to system conversion, the Job Detail will display an Effective Date of July 1, 2002."
* raptop
???
<WeylandsWings>
raptop: say only if you get paid from that date
<raptop>
hah
<egg|anbo|egg>
hm, the diffraction limit for VIIRS I1 would be 3 m at the diffraction limit, rather than the actual 375 m, so I guess I have to take other factors into account >_>
* raptop
has a silly thought
<raptop>
It's going to be amusing if the 2022 form 1040 has a deduction for getting a COVID-19 vaccine that was not covered by insurance
<egg|anbo|egg>
raptop: what limits the resolution on a thing like VIIRS?
* raptop
isn't familiar with the instrument, though I assume the wide spectral range limits some things in the design
<raptop>
hm, it's 19 cm in diameter
<raptop>
Also the talk about swathes makes it sound like a pushbroom o_O
<egg|anbo|egg>
it’s radiometry, not sure what that implies
<egg|anbo|egg>
at 12.4 μm the diffraction limit would be 65 m so the I5 band is closer to that, but it’s weird that the visible imaging bands are so far from the diffraction limit O_o
<galois>
[WIKIPEDIA] Sentinel-2#Instrument MSI | "Sentinel-2 est une série de satellites d'observation de la Terre de l'Agence spatiale européenne développée dans le cadre du programme Copernicus dont les deux premiers exemplaires ont été mis en orbite en 2015 et 2017. L'objectif du programme est de fournir aux pays européens des données complètes et…"
<egg|laptop|egg>
UmbralRaptop: is this just limited by downlink bandwidth, or are there deep reasons to not go anywhere near the diffraction limit
egg|laptop|egg has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<raptop>
FoV?
<raptop>
I mean, I'm under the impression that anything optical is diffraction limited if you want it to be
<egg|anbo|egg>
the swath for VIIRS is 120°
<raptop>
that's a very wide FoV
<egg|anbo|egg>
but the question is more why would you not want it to be diffraction-limited
<raptop>
!wa 5e-7/0.19*180/3.14159*3600
<raptop>
;wa 5e-7/0.19*180/3.14159*3600
<raptop>
bah
<egg|anbo|egg>
tfw no kmath
<egg|anbo|egg>
!wa llaby
<raptop>
call it half an arc-second for nyquist-sampled diffraction limited pixels
<raptop>
so, uh, 864000 pixels wide
<raptop>
VRO's raft is only like 56000 pixels on a side
<raptop>
Anyway, you could easily end up with gigapixel images in the visible
<egg|anbo|egg>
yeah so VIIRS/Suomi NPP does 7.7Mbps
<egg|anbo|egg>
but I am calculating 2300 pixels * band / day
<egg|anbo|egg>
which seems wrong, since I don’t think they have 5000 bits per pixel
<egg|anbo|egg>
that would be some truly fine grained radiometry