egg changed the topic of #principia to: Logs: https://esper.irclog.whitequark.org/principia | <scott_manley> anyone that doubts the wisdom of retrograde bop needs to get the hell out | https://xkcd.com/323/ | <egg> calculating the influence of lamont on Pluto is a bit silly…
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<queqiao-> ⟨prophet1313⟩ Im not sure if this should go here or in #mechjeb-pvg but im having a weird issue, a few days ago, without updating mech jeb or anything, "Execute Principia Node" disappeared and is no longer an option at all
_whitelogger has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ you updated your dev release, it knows you've got principia installed so execute node is execute principia node
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ * new releases know
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ * somehow updated your MJ
_whitelogger has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ will my existing orbits get corrupted if i install principia to an existing save with crafts orbiting different bodies?
<raptop> Yes, and your space program will be bankrupted by all the bribes. (more seriously, low orbits will be fine, but hopefully you don't want anything in a particularly specific orbit. Anything in flight between different bodies is likely to be heading off into the void)
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ i have a venus probe that is orbiting very elliptical and has a periapsis of +10km of the atmo, i think it'll disintegrate 😭
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ how does the bot talk
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ oh nvm it's not abot
* raptop flips sign. Zero [0] days since I've last failed a Turing test
<queqiao-> ⟨Damien⟩ Orbiting bodies is fine, travelling between bodies isn't
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ uh too late i got many many exceptions when i loaded into the save and decided to make a new save 🙂
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ oh nvm it's not a bot
raptop has quit [Ping timeout: 190 seconds]
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ speaking of the new principia maneuver node executor code in MJ: does anyone have any feedback on if it is more or less precise in executing nodes? it is still not closed loop so it won't be perfect, but i thought that i fixed a few bugs in the delta-v accounting in the old code, which might address some of the old complaints about it burning too long. siimav in particular?
<queqiao-> ⟨siimav⟩ As shocking as it might be, I don't play with the 🟪🍜
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ lol, i guess i thought you were doing principia testing when it was just rss
<queqiao-> ⟨sichelgaita⟩ "Many exceptions" is not the behaviour that you'll see when loading an existing save. Have you read this: https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/wiki/Installing,-reporting-bugs,-and-frequently-asked-questions#the-case-of-badimageformatexception
<queqiao-> ⟨sichelgaita⟩ +?
<queqiao-> ⟨ferristik⟩ nah it was different types of exceptions
raptop has joined #principia
_whitelogger has joined #principia
<_whitenotifier-ee4> [Principia] pleroy opened pull request #3816: Properly reset the optimizer after each change of the flight plan - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3816
raptop has quit [Quit: leaving]
armed_troop has quit [*.net *.split]
queqiao- has quit [*.net *.split]
armed_troop has joined #principia
queqiao- has joined #principia
raptop has joined #principia