05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — Funny enough, the top posts on r/astrology are actually very cool as far as astrodynamics goes

05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/645852264527036416/7s59t4wy3r431.png

05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/645852275335495680/7dfnq3hxk5p31.png

05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — (this one has got to be edited thought)

05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/645852369401151498/394cxwb1jzj31.png

05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — (this one has got to be edited though) (edited)

05:06 <discord-> n​eph. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/645852369401151498/394cxwb1jzj31.png

05:22 <_whitenotifier-31f> [Principia] Kerbinator-CN commented on issue #2347: Burn in time warp with RO ion engines (new feature suggestions) - https://git.io/JeKk9

13:23 <discord-> D​amien. — @egg @egg when are going to move away from your mathematicians naming scheme and switch to KSP mod devs?

13:23 <discord-> D​amien. — @egg when are going to move away from your mathematicians naming scheme and switch to KSP mod devs? (edited)

13:24 <discord-> D​amien. — and will there be an egg release

13:24 <discord-> e​gg. — What's wrong with dead mathematicians

13:24 <discord-> D​amien. — can't ping those guys on discord

13:26 <discord-> D​amien. — can't wait for celestial trajectory plotting btw

14:27 <discord-> e​gg. — You can try the automated builds now I think

14:27 <discord-> e​gg. — Let me do some shopping and I'll see if I can point you to those

14:29 <discord-> D​amien. — didn't even know automated builds were a thing

14:29 <discord-> D​amien. — 🙂

14:29 <discord-> D​amien. — I've not played for a while and keep putting it off because of the heavy development pace

14:29 <discord-> D​amien. — I've not played for a while and keep putting it off because of the heavy development pace on RP-1 (edited)

14:29 <discord-> D​amien. — I'll give the new celestial stuff a go on stock I reckon

14:30 <discord-> D​amien. — do the stock planets have J2 configs now by default or does that have to be added ourselves?

14:32 <discord-> s​iimav. — > heavy development pace on RP-1

14:32 <discord-> s​iimav. — Thanks. Although I'm kinda surprised that you think so.

14:40 <discord-> D​amien. — admittedly I'm going off discord chatter rather than github activity

14:41 <discord-> D​amien. — and I'm including ROKerbalism and neph's NQB stuff

14:41 <discord-> D​amien. — just seems like a lot's being done

17:05 <discord-> G​regrox. — pretty sure this is photoshopped

17:05 <discord-> G​regrox. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/646033153302986811/7s59t4wy3r431.png

17:05 <discord-> G​regrox. — and does not represent anything astronomically correct

17:05 <discord-> G​regrox. — and does not represent anything astronomically correct or meaningful (edited)

17:05 <discord-> G​regrox. — like

17:06 <discord-> G​regrox. — the full moon should be 180 degrees around the sky from the new moon, but this is clearly not a panorama

17:07 <discord-> G​regrox. — this is correct I think, though

17:07 <discord-> G​regrox. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/646033639234207819/7dfnq3hxk5p31.png

17:07 <discord-> G​regrox. — this is correct I think, though: (edited)

17:07 <discord-> G​regrox. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/646033639234207819/7dfnq3hxk5p31.png

17:11 <discord-> S​umguy. — Yeah, there’s no beating /tg/station in development pace

17:12 <discord-> n​eph. — The first one is meaningful

17:12 <discord-> n​eph. — But it's not taken at the same time of day, it's taken when the moon is highest

17:13 <discord-> n​eph. — At least, that's my semi-educated guess with a healthy benefit of the doubt

17:15 <discord-> n​eph. — That said, looking at one of NASA's lunar analemmas, I'm starting to wonder if it's not also photoshopped. It doesn't look like an analemma, I assume that variations in the orbit of the moon wouldn't happen rapidly enough to produce that weird shape, and the size and spacing also seems iffy. Maybe it's an inclination difference to account for the smaller shape, but I'm starting to doubt that.

17:15 <discord-> n​eph. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/646035771328954403/LunarAnalemma_richins_c72.png

17:16 <discord-> n​eph. — That said, looking at one of NASA's lunar analemmas, I'm starting to wonder if it's not also photoshopped. It doesn't look like an analemma, I assume that variations in the orbit of the moon wouldn't happen rapidly enough to produce that weird shape, and the size and spacing also seems iffy. Maybe a latitude difference could account for the smaller shape, but I'm starting to doubt that. (edited)

17:16 <discord-> n​eph. — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/480397772248580098/646035771328954403/LunarAnalemma_richins_c72.png

22:41 <discord-> e​gg. — @Damien if you want J2 on the stock system you have to add it

22:41 <discord-> e​gg. — as @Sir Mortimer told you earlier

23:35 <discord-> D​amien. — Ok thanks. He did say but I thought I'd check with the egg 🥚