12:55 <Starwaster> why doesn't RP-1 have any sort of github presence or other repository presence? (or does it...?)

15:11 <Starwaster> soundnfury I don't see a way to define new asteroid types such as carbonaceous... what you can do is define the odds of a given resource being present and a low/high range of how much of it is present... I could add a new resource to the asteroid config for carbon based resources... every other resource present in the config has its own configured chance of being present too, can't stop that....

15:16 <Starwaster> still looking for some way of having asteroid types... something spawns them... if I can hook into that something...

16:13 <Mike`> Starwaster what do you mean by presence? rp-0 (=rp-1) is on github, although not much activity, currently only snf is merging some PRs every now and then

16:57 <Starwaster> mike` what do you mean by what do I mean?

17:01 <Mike`> well, rp-1 is present as in its code is there, not sure though if that was what you wanted to know. :)

19:36 <Starwaster> mike` I was just being a dick. Someone used that line on me 18 years ago and I've been waiting ever since to use it on someone else because it pissed me off back then

19:37 <Mike`> :D

19:39 <Starwaster> ok so it looks like... all I have to do is define a part with ModuleAsteroid in it and there's a chance of THAT part being spawned instead of the standard potatoroid... presumably (two parts with ModuleAsteroid) 50/50 chance.... still doesn't really let me control how many asteroids are of a specified type (carbonaceous, nickel iron, etc...)

19:39 <Starwaster> oh that's for soundnfury I guess....

19:42 <Starwaster> still would like to know what specific part of the code is responsible for SPAWNING them in the first place. Maybe the contract system?

19:44 <Starwaster> maybe I'll just hook into the asteroid spawning event and throw an error so I can do a traceback on the code

22:20 <soundnfury> Starwaster: I think they're spawned by some bit of stock-ksp code we can't get at :(

22:21 <soundnfury> your traceback suggestion sounds like a good way to proceed, maybe we can monkeypatch it idk

22:46 <Starwaster> soundnfury if I can even find it so I can read it that will give me what I need to find the best way to deal with it

22:55 <soundnfury> yep gl