egg changed the topic of #principia to: Logs: https://esper.irclog.whitequark.org/principia | <scott_manley> anyone that doubts the wisdom of retrograde bop needs to get the hell out | https://xkcd.com/323/ | <egg> calculating the influence of lamont on Pluto is a bit silly…
_whitelogger has joined #principia
UmbralRaptop has quit [Ping timeout: 190 seconds]
<_whitenotifier-1adf> [Principia] pleroy closed pull request #3611: Remove compatibility namespaces from testing_utilities - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3611
<_whitenotifier-1adf> [Principia] pleroy commented on pull request #3610: Check for “remove before flight” comments - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3610#issuecomment-1515284595
<_whitenotifier-1adf> [Principia] pleroy opened pull request #3612: Remove compatibility namespaces from tools - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3612
UmbralRaptop has joined #principia
<_whitenotifier-1adf> [Principia] pleroy closed pull request #3612: Remove compatibility namespaces from tools - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3612
queqiao- has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
queqiao- has joined #principia
<queqiao-> ⟨Fiora⟩ actually on that note, how do people do transfer calculatoins in principia? do you use the mechjeb calculator, copy it into principia, and tweak it?
<_whitenotifier-1adf> [Principia] eggrobin closed pull request #3610: Check for “remove before flight” comments - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3610
<queqiao-> ⟨lpg⟩ being off "100+ m/s" sounds to me like something went wrong
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ rsparkyc wrote this guide: […] ⮪ The short version is: you probably want to get an idea of the windows from somewhere else, then playing with the reference frames and the noodles
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ +it’s about
<queqiao-> ⟨lpg⟩ I also had the impression that the same change that took spoolup into account also switched to being dv-based instead of time-based https://discord.com/channels/319857228905447436/480397772248580098/952105971101098034
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ Ah yes, https://github.com/MuMech/MechJeb2/pull/1524 seems to say so.
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ So I guess it is no longer quite as open loop?
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ Being off 100+ m/s is definitely weird then.
<queqiao-> ⟨Al₂Me₆⟩ ⟪egg⟫ So I guess it is no longer quite as […] ⮪ Leaky-loop guidance?
<queqiao-> ⟨Fiora⟩ actually might have been less than 100m/s, i should test it again to be sure. i guess the difference between 34.8mm and 35.7mm isn't that huge
<queqiao-> ⟨lpg⟩ it's quite small
<queqiao-> ⟨Al₂Me₆⟩ (m != M…)
<queqiao-> ⟨Fiora⟩ * 34.8Mm and 35.7Mm
<queqiao-> ⟨Fiora⟩ anyways i think i got the gist of it, ty!
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ ⟪Fiora⟫ actually might have been less than […] ⮪ That’s going to depend on the periapsis, but with a periapsis altitude of 500 km, it looks like it’s more like 15 m/s.
<queqiao-> ⟨lpg⟩ it's also been my experience that the executor tends to overshoot rather than undershoot
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ egg can you load up a maneuver node's "patch" attribute (which i'm assuming is the next patch after the maneuver node executes in stock KSP) with the osculating orbit post-burn?
<queqiao-> ⟨lamont⟩ so osculating orbit at your computed burnout point
<queqiao-> ⟨egg⟩ ⟪lamont⟫ egg can you load up a maneuver node's […] ⮪ Hmm. I am using the "patch", but not in a way that tells me whether it is the osculating orbit before or after the manœuvre… https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/blob/0641148191639beea116c0f97b01ae35fd487a39/ksp_plugin_adapter/ksp_plugin_adapter.cs#L1848-L1866
<_whitenotifier-1adf> [Principia] eggrobin commented on pull request #3609: A test for the rotating-pulsating reference frame - https://github.com/mockingbirdnest/Principia/pull/3609#issuecomment-1515464854