Deddly changed the topic of #KSPOfficial to: Kerbal Space Program official channel | Latest versions: 1.8.1, NaN | Rules: tinyurl.com/KSP-Rules | "modcall" to call ops | ΔV maps: https://i.imgur.com/CHVnEeE.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/gBoLsSt.png | Type "chanlog" for logs |
Fluburtur has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<packbart>
those XL3 wheels reach ridiculous speeds in a curve. 70+m/s with a 40t rover/mobile base
<packbart>
the antenna was destroyed by aero forces m/
<UmbralRaptor>
o_O
<packbart>
ah, it even says so in the wiki. "the tank steering doesnt work the way it should (e.g. stopping the left wheels to turn left). Instead, they boost the speed of the other side (e.g. boosting the right wheels to turn left)"
<UmbralRaptor>
eek
Shoe has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
FLHerne has quit [Ping timeout: 198 seconds]
Wastl2 has joined #KSPOfficial
Wastl4 has quit [Ping timeout: 198 seconds]
Pariah_Zero has quit [Ping timeout: 190 seconds]
Pariah_Zero has joined #KSPOfficial
zephyrus has quit [Quit: WeeChat 2.7]
Wastl4 has joined #KSPOfficial
Wastl2 has quit [Ping timeout: 190 seconds]
umaxtu_ has joined #KSPOfficial
umaxtu has quit [Ping timeout: 202 seconds]
pacbard has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
pacbard has joined #KSPOfficial
dnsmcbr has joined #KSPOfficial
Althego has joined #KSPOfficial
JVFoxy has joined #KSPOfficial
JVFoxy has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Lyneira has joined #KSPOfficial
umaxtu_ has quit [Read error: -0x1: UNKNOWN ERROR CODE (0001)]
dnsmcbr has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
Shoe has joined #KSPOfficial
Deddly has joined #KSPOfficial
darsie has joined #KSPOfficial
Shoe has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
Fluburtur has joined #KSPOfficial
hatrix has joined #KSPOfficial
<hatrix>
hey, I've got a design question. I'm trying to make something like that https://i.imgur.com/WPx6zAl.png but I've got problems with the tri-coupler as it will only attach to one cabin. Is there a better way?
UmbralRaptor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
UmbralRaptop has joined #KSPOfficial
<Mat2ch>
hatrix: yes and no.
<darsie>
hatrix: Attach the cabins to the tricoupler?
<Mat2ch>
darsie: then the cabins aren't attached properly ;)
<hatrix>
but then I'd have to put a tricoupler on the other end no?
<UmbralRaptop>
parts with looping connections are a hassle
<Mat2ch>
hatrix: the way KSP manages the nodes makes it hard to do such a design
<Mat2ch>
you can use docking ports though
<UmbralRaptop>
^
<Mat2ch>
so add two docking ports to each node
<Mat2ch>
there will be one that is the main and connected from the start, the other two pairs will connect themselfs when loading the craft
<Mat2ch>
*themselves
<hatrix>
that's the kind of hack I was looking for
<hatrix>
are docking ports sturdy enough though?
<Mat2ch>
Multi-node crafts would be nice. Would make it easier to built huuuuuuuuge things. :D
<Mat2ch>
well, three pairs are. :D
<Mat2ch>
and you can add struts, if you don't trust them
<Mat2ch>
But I sometimes even attach boosters with them...
<hatrix>
would putting a tricoupler and move it inside the rocket also work?
<darsie>
You could make a string of cubic struts and attach the cabins there.
<darsie>
Can you attach the struts in the center of the tricoupler? Then you could attach the cabins to the tricoupler and whatever is below to the string.
<hatrix>
ok my last screen doesn't work, it's well aligned but not attached